POWER DYNAMICS IN DECISION MAKING: A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS
Keywords:
Power dynamics, decision-making, and qualitative analysis.Abstract
This qualitative study explores power dynamics in decision-making processes across various organizational contexts, focusing on the interplay of hierarchical, informal, and structural factors. Findings indicate that hierarchical power significantly influences decision-making, with leaders often controlling outcomes, while individuals without formal authority exert influence through strategic negotiation and alliance-building. Communication emerged as a critical mediator, with assertive participants dominating discussions and marginalized voices facing systemic barriers. Structural and cultural factors, such as high power distance and hierarchical reporting lines, were found to reinforce power asymmetries, while ethical and emotional dimensions added complexity to the decision-making process. This study highlights the need for participatory decision-making models, inclusive communication practices, and leadership development programs emphasizing empathy and ethical decision-making. Addressing systemic biases and cultural barriers is essential to create equitable organizational environments. The research contributes to the understanding of power dynamics in decision-making and provides actionable insights for fostering more collaborative and inclusive organizational practices. Future research should investigate power dynamics in diverse cultural and technological settings to deepen insights into evolving decision-making paradigms.
Downloads
References
ATLAS.ti. (2024). Power Dynamics in Research: Definition, Examples & Awareness. Retrieved from https://atlasti.com/guides/qualitative-research-guide-part-1/power-dynamics
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in Social Power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. SAGE Publications.
Insight7. (2024). Understanding Power Dynamic Definition in Research. Retrieved from https://insight7.io/understanding-power-dynamic-definition-in-research
Kawakami, A., Coston, A., Heidari, H., Holstein, K., & Zhu, H. (2024). Studying Up Public Sector AI: How Networks of Power Relations Shape Agency Decisions Around AI Design and Use. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.12458
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. PublicAffairs.
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Scheller, F., Doser, I., Schulte, E., Johanning, S., McKenna, R., & Bruckner, T. (2021). Stakeholder dynamics in residential solar energy adoption: findings from focus group discussions in Germany. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.14240
Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. William Morrow.
Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306294258
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS (IJEFE) © 2024 by Adisam Publihser is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0